By EMILY JOSEPH<\/p>\n
If you’ve checked Twitter lately (or opened up the Internet for that matter) you will know that Kim Kardashian is trying to “break the Internet.”<\/p>\n
Ground-breaking news, right?<\/p>\n
Kardashian took\u00a0very tasteless (read: nude) photos for\u00a0an issue of Paper Magazine<\/em>,\u00a0which was released earlier this week. The “goal” was to get the magazine and Kardashian trending on social media so much that the Internet would crash, at least I think that was the point.<\/p>\n Regardless, it’s been a topic of discussion.<\/p>\n Using\u00a0social media to promote the cover is one thing, but when journalists start reporting reporting on it? Simply absurd. This “story”\u00a0does not deserve the attention it’s gotten but unfortunately, sex, entertainment and controversy sells. Readers and viewers hone in on stories like this that are pop-culture focused with recognizable names probably more than an international or finance story.<\/p>\n What’s funny is that in\u00a0all of the #breaktheinternet coverage, the reporters discussing the topic bash Kardashian and the hashtag trend. I’ve heard things like “Horrific! She is famous for nothing,” “I can’t believe people are following this trend,” and “why are we talking about this?”<\/p>\n Yes, why are you talking about it<\/em>? If you don’t find it valuable information to report to the public, use some judgement and shut your mouth.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" By EMILY JOSEPH If you’ve checked Twitter lately (or opened up the Internet for that matter) you will know that Kim Kardashian is trying to “break the Internet.” Ground-breaking news, right? Kardashian took\u00a0very tasteless (read: nude) photos for\u00a0an issue of … Continue reading