By AMANDA PRATS<\/p>\n
In the age of fake news, alternative facts and Facebook feeds, attempting to filter through the deluge of media we are faced with can be overwhelming.<\/p>\n
For many, the difficulty of this task unfortunately translates into a complete lack of filtering.<\/p>\n
Simply put, it\u2019s often easiest to take the information presented to us at face value rather than critically examining our sources. This has led to what some have called a misinformation crisis, with \u201cfake news\u201d stories become a story of their own, particularly during the 2016 presidential election.<\/p>\n
Beyond simply trying to find information that is at the very least reliable, challenging our personal views takes a step further. Many have referred to social media as an \u201cecho chamber,\u201d and have criticized it\u2019s functionality as a source for news because we tend to receive information that falls in line with our personal opinions and the opinions of people in our social circles.<\/p>\n
There is an incredible value in reading opinions that challenge ours, which is why The New York Times<\/em> compiled a list of quality partisan writing to expose readers to diverse viewpoints. The list included links to articles from the right, left and center from a variety of sources. The list can be viewed here<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" By AMANDA PRATS In the age of fake news, alternative facts and Facebook feeds, attempting to filter through the deluge of media we are faced with can be overwhelming. For many, the difficulty of this task unfortunately translates into a … Continue reading