By KYLA THORPE
It seems to happen nearly every year. Movie producers in Hollywood are often doing reboots of films that were big hits.
Why can’t they just leave the original film alone? Don’t they realize that it’s a little strange to recreate movies, with new actors, when the original actors are still alive and well, able to continue their previous roles?
I can understand rebooting a film that was created 40 or more years ago. The film could’ve been terrible back then and producers want to make something big of it now. Maybe Hollywood wants to bring a trend back, make some extra cash. I get it, it’s a business.
What really annoys me is how movies that were terrific not even more than 10 years ago are being remade into newer films with terrible reviews.
For example, I remember seeing the original Spider-Man movie in the theater in 2002. I loved it. The world loved it. Tobey Maguire played this role until 2007, ending the series with Spider-Man 3.
So why was it rebooted in 2012 and called the Amazing Spider-Man, with a new actor, Andrew Garfield?
This is strange to me and confusing. Between the original Spider-Man and the Amazing Spider-Man, there isn’t even 10 years. They could’ve just asked Tobey Maguire to come back and restart the series!
Doesn’t Hollywood hire script writers to create new material? Are there no other superheroes within the Marvel or DC Comic Universe for them to create an extensive series about?
The reason why I’m asking this question is that, today, the cast for the new Fantastic Four movie was released. The Fantastic Four movie, that I also saw in the theater, came out in 2005. The new one is slated for 2015.
Reboots for movies that aren’t at least 20 years old are unnecessary. The point of a reboot is to make something better, to bring it more to life.
Reboots are usually rated lower, have around the same CGI and have similar story lines where the audience is not at all very surprised by the ending.
When will Hollywood stop doing this?